3, not 33

posted by Mike Boone at 14h08 EST on Mar 24


The Canadiens will retire at least one more number during the team's centennial 2008-'09 season.

Everyone thinks Patrick Roy is a lock.

I respectfully disagree. Roy's latest goon show in the Q is further evidence that his name does not belong up in the Bell Centre rafters with Canadiens' immortals such as Maurice Richard, Jean Béliveau, Guy Lafleur – and Bob Gainey.

Yes, Patrick Roy was a great goaltender. I'm too young to remember Jacques Plante, but Red Fisher rates him Canadiens best ever. Considering the team Roy had in front of him, though, I'd rank him a shade ahead of Ken Dryden.

Plante's number 1 and Dryden's 29 have been retired. So why not 33?

Because the guy who wore it is an embarrassment to hockey.

Look, admission to sports Halls of Fame should be based purely on achievement. You put up the numbers, you're in.

Pete Rose belongs in Cooperstown. So do Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.

Retired numbers are different. The roof of the Bell Centre is a Hall of the Hallowed. Every name up there wore his Canadiens' number with pride and distinction.

They were great athletes – and they were great human beings.

Patrick Roy was a great hockey player. He is a not-so-great human being.

Moreover, as my friend and mentor Mr. Fisher points out, Patrick Roy quit on the Montreal Canadiens.

So let Colorado retire his number.

And on a special night during their centennial season, Canadiens can honour Emile "Butch" Bouchard by retiring number 3.

Want to honour Patrick Roy?

Retire 9-1-1 

 




StumbleUpon

Comments

[Jump to comment form]

Forlando's picture
Does he deserve his Jersey retired? I think he does. Is it the right time to do it? I really don't think so. I think he auto-sabotaged his chances with the recent events.

I didn't want 33 retired before this and I sure don't want it retired now. If a guy quits on his team then he can't have his number retired. Plain and simple. You can talk about Trembley yes he didn't handle it the right way, but Patrick didn't either. All Patrick had to do was keep his mouth shut and ask for a trade after the game or at a later point. He showed no class then and has many times since. When I go a any arena where players are honored there should be no mixed emotions or questions that the player belongs there. In the case of 33 with the Habs my stomach would turn.

RudeMood19's picture
Several things... 1. Isn't Guy Lafleur in a lot of trouble with the Montreal authorities which directly negates the "they were great human beings" argument 2. How can you not retire Roy's 33? Logic, he was the best goalie, arguably, we've ever had, especially in the clutch 3. If I do recall, we had an moronic coach in Mario Tremblay. Again, why would you leave your #1 goalie in the net on the ice for 9 goals, THEN decide to pull him? What good does that do? If I were Roy, if ANYONE was Roy, would you not be annoyed, especially after all you had done for the franchise and arguably single-handedly won them 2 championships because of incredible goal keeping? 4. To further cement Roy's place in the rafters, how much has that trade set back this franchise? We traded him, and wow, we've had some goaltending gems with Thibault, Hackett, Moog, Theodore, anyone else? (which further proves they were mediocre). Hence the Curse of St. Patrick. It illustrates Roy's importance to them team and what a valuable commodity he was. 5. Notice how there is no left of that administration who ridded us of Roy's brilliance? There's a reason. All in all, while I think Roy regrets what he did with the Remparts, this is NO way should reflect the player he was with the Canadiens. He should be up in the rafters. His competitive nature should not hinder his reputation. And, of course, sorry for the long post. ____________________________________________________________ 1. February 19th, 2008, a day which will live in sublimity.

G-Man's picture
Many denigrate the '86 and '93 teams. The Habs won AS A TEAM. Roy did not put any pucks in the net, he kept them out. People behave as if he didn't have any D, which is ridiculous. BTW, when he QUIT on the team, and he did QUIT, that's enough to say that he thought HE was the team. Clearly, he was a valuable ingredient, but his selfish me-first routine has soured me on him for the longest while. This latest episode cements the deal. These days, he's just another bonehead in the Q who will never coach in the NHL. Celebrating jerks isn't what retiring the sweater is about. It about honouring those who brought honour to the team. Gilbert

RudeMood19's picture
Are you justifying Tremblay's actions? By the way, valuable ingredient is an understatement. More like essential commodity. _____________________________________________________________ 1. February 19th, 2008, a day which will live in sublimity.

G-Man's picture
"Look, admission to sports Halls of Fame should be based purely on achievement. You put up the numbers, you're in. Pete Rose belongs in Cooperstown. So do Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens." Pete Rose's play was affected by his gambling, both as player and manager. I agree with MLB. Banned for life. Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens are nothing but cheats who deserve only scorn. That goes for all "athletes" who cheat(by using banned substances). They merit nothing, because what they've accomplished was under the influence of something completely unnatural and totally pharmaceutical. Those 2 bozos don't even have the balls to own up, much like Lance "I haven't been caught yet" Armstrong. They have millions in the bank. I hope they spend it well because their health will not be good for much longer. Gilbert

TC's picture
It's interesting to see how this thread has brought up some long held bitter feeling towards Patrick Roy. I find it ironic that so many people seem to think that he quit on his team. As I've said before the team and the organization quit on him. Does this mean that these same people feel that Mario Tremblay made the right move in leaving Roy in the nets in that blowout? that Tremblay's public humiliation of one of the most valuable Canadiens of all time was justified? that treating a man who had carried the team to two Stanley Cups with no respect is something to be admired? It's funny how people have rose coloured glasses about Roy and the team. Not all of the names hanging from the rafters had fuzzy feelings about their departure from the Habs. Plante, Harvey, Geoffrion, Lafleur, Moore, Savard, and Robinson all finished their career's elsewhere, and all left the Habs under circumstances no better or worse than Roy. And how did the Montreal organization treat their greatest star after his retirement. After all, some of us remember the "Rocket" having to sell fishing line in down and out Quebec dives to make a living in the late 1960's. T.C. tc.denault@habsworld.net

cautiousoptimist's picture
Patrick Roy is a goon, a thug, and an excellent goalie. I don't have much respect for him off the ice, but I can't argue with the fact that he was a fantastic goalie. But when your number hangs from the rafters, it's because you're an inspiration to the latest generation of players and fans - something to aspire to. Roy's clear signal to his own son to skate the length of the ice and jump the opposing goalie make it clear that he isn't. The other guy didn't drop his gloves, didn't want to fight, never threw a punch, and was just standing in his crease waiting for the brawl to end when Roy Jr. jumped him, ripped off his mask and smashed his face in over and over and over - even after the guy was flat on the ice and barely moving. The guy is just trying to cover his head - he's not even fighting back. Then Roy, the epitome of class, skates around the ice and gives the crowd a two-handed one-finger salute before skating off the ice, probably to a slap on the back from dad. These two videos are pretty damning stuff. Roy Sr. walked out on his team, was a thug long before he got into that fistfight after coaching one of his minor league games a while back, and he's evidently brought up his son to be as much of an *** as he is. He's not something for our boys to aspire to, and doesn't belong in the rafters. www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

tony d's picture
right on cautious....well put

I hope they don't retire Roy's number, and I pray that there will be some kind of homage shown to the men who were behind the bench and in the office; Irvin, Blake, Bowman, Pollock where all as responsible as the players for the glory and respect this franchise has. The reason I don't want Roy is simple, he turned his back on his team, and that is something the Numbers in rafters would never have done. Raising his number does more damage than giving him something he does not deserve, it demeans all those who were there before him. Quite frankly, if he does get his jersey raised, it will sully the organization a little to have his number hanging beside the likes of Plante, Richard, Richard, Gainey, Robinson, Morenz, Harvey et all. Please don't retire that jersey, he wanted out, so now let him stay out.

doug's picture
i think we've become too lenient with the retirements of jerseys. i loved how hard it was - and roy does deserve it. cournoyer didn't, in my opinion. let him in and now it's serge savard (also questionable to me), guy lapointe, jacques lemaire, steve shutt. how about mats naslund, then? oh, and if gainey gets it (deserved) why not carbonneau (not). and nonsense on here about koivu- love the guy, but on some weak teams, at times, he hasn't even been the best player in my opinion. geoffrion, lafleur, robinson, harvey, beliveau, dryden, the two richards. . . those were LEGENDS. . . throw in roy there and he doesn't look out of place. cournoyer was a ridiculous call in my opinion.

cautiousoptimist's picture
Koivu's a lock when he retires. How many years has he been with this team now? If the criteria are "exceptional human being," "contribution to the team" and "contribution to the city," then #11 needs to be up there. Would send a nice message too, making him the first European up there - just like he'll be the first European captain to win the Cup. :) www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

GHG33's picture
btw, his son did apoligize for his antics: http://www.nhl.com/nhl/app?articleid=357951&page=NewsPage&service=page He did not apoligize for fighting the other goalie however.

Yeah but so did Bertuzzi, Simon and Pronger. They have all apologized at one time or another. The way that kid acted made me sick, hitting someone who is not fighting back, who is on the ground and then giving the crowd the double bird, the punk should have been hip-checked by Scott Stevens.

Everybody apologizes. 99% of losers that show up in court show(the operative word here is show) remorse in front of the judge. They are usually directed to by their lawyers so as to mitigate their sentences. I'm not saying the kid wasn't remorsefull - but just saying it doesn't mean that he was. GO HABS.

I loved Patrick Roy. Patrick Roy was a hero of mine. But Patrick Roy walked out on my team. Yes Mario was an idiot. And yes Rejean Houle was a moron. But Patrick Roy walked out on us. And frankly for us to hang your name on our rafters, you have to first apologize for walking out on us. Before they put his name on ceiling, they had better hang Mr. Koivu's number. He hung around long after it was obvious we sucked. And he did whatever he could to hang around even when idiots wanted to run him out of town because he couldn't speak French. So no. Mr Roy you're not welcome next to Mr. Plante or Mr. Harvey or Mr. Dryden.

tony d's picture
Mike, I totally agree...this is the legacy that Roy is leaving....after an incident like that, who cares about the awards and the cups he's won?....what goes around comes around... he's promoting that ugly goon mentality and spoiling the game he used to be proud of... a total embarrassment and disgusting...he does not deserve to share the rafters with our proudest

NLhabsfan's picture
5-1!!!!!

Hammer's picture
There is no doubt Pat Roy was the goalie of his generation. As for the dark ages " 1994- 2001 or so", the Habs stunk, end of story, but so do Pat's recent antics!!!! I have been a die hard fan since 1966, and I have seen far too many goalies come through the system, and by far K Dryden and Roy were the best. What folks do not seem to realize is that Dryden won the cup for the habs in the late 60's ( think it was 69 or 70)as a late season call up. As for antics, people are trying to compare Guy with Pat. But folks you cannot do that. Guy was not directly in charge of teens, Pat is. I will say this as a huge Roy fan, he sucks as a leader of youth. If he did not wave his boy on, he did absolutely nothing to stop him either!!I always thought a coach was in charge of the bench, but Pat's mia culpa does not cut it. Ya, they should hang his jersey from the rafters, but no one should ever mistake it for the Habs condoning his recent actions. He may be a "God" to some for " winning the Habs two cups", but as a mentor for youth, his recent actions leave everything to be desired. It is time for Pat to bring the same level of professionalism shown as a Hall of Fame goalie to today's youth. They deserve better.

doug's picture
wonderfully put

Keith's picture
Great blast, Andre K the Giant!

Keith's picture
I wanna see the Habs HIT these guys tonight. No free passes, NO QUARTER!

NLhabsfan's picture
I agree with Mr. Fisher points on Roy...BUT I would not judge the father for a sons indiscretions.The fight was disgusting and young Roy's reaction was despicable.

NLhabsfan's picture
Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens took steroids...period.NO to HOF..Nuff said!!.

Fer_hab's picture
Mike its hard for me to say that I've lost respect for you for posting this blog. You and the entire HIO are the reason why we all gather here everyday I would be no better then all the people/"mentors" here whose judgements on Roy are based his last game. I won't judge you on your last blog.

J.T.'s picture
Who are you kidding, Mike? Hall of the Hallowed? So, Doug Harvey was a great guy, but don't tell me he didn't fall around drunk for half his life. Don't tell me Guy Lafleur's been a shining example of all that's honourable and law-abiding. Or that Jacques Plante didn't refuse to play many games and eventually got traded because Toe Blake couldn't put up with him anymore. Or that Dryden didn't hold out for an entire season in a contract dispute and leave the team high and dry. I'm willing to bet there's not a guy up there, with the possible exception of Jean Beliveau, who doesn't have some dirty laundry, on or off the ice. The reason they're up there is because they brought glory to the team. Niceness and off-ice uprightness is purely a bonus. Joe Juneau may have been one of the most selfless men to play for the Habs, but he won't get his number retired because of that. It's true most of the rafter-dwellers had those qualities, regardless of what slip-ups they might have made. But they shouldn't be disqualified from hanging up there if they did show a less-than-stellar human side from time to time. Neither should Patrick Roy. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

GHG33's picture
Great post.. Agree 100%!

Excellent post.

sidhu's picture
Excellent post J.T.!

I smell a good cop, bad cop routine here...

Mr.Hazard's picture
Roy jr. should be arrested for that disgusting stunt. I am disgusted. Disgusted, no less. Ex nihilo nihil fit

Arrested. I can only laugh at you poor deluded souls. If the opposing goalie skates out to the blueline during a brawl, hes looking for something. He found it.

cautiousoptimist's picture
Blue line? Nadeau stayed in his net, didn't drop his gloves, didn't want to fight and never got a punch off. Roy skated the length of the rink and wailed on him anyway, before giving the entire crowd the finger. Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaDu9qYcPXM www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

Gormdog's picture
It's hockey, relax. We've all seen much worse in our day, yet no one in jail...

Mr.Hazard's picture
Yes, I was exaggerating! Ex nihilo nihil fit

Gormdog's picture
If it wasn't for Roy, it would have been more than 22 years since we last won a cup. It wouldn't make us the Leafs, but we certainly wouldn't be the Habs either. I don't really care what Roy does off the ice, players are human and so is Patrick Roy. I mean, he's one of the few players in the history of the NHL that you can argue as being the best ever... And we're too good to have his number retired because he got DISRESPECTED out of town and has a nutter for a son? Patty Roy, 33, great player wherever he went, but I want him to be a Canadien forever...

P St. Pierre's picture
You know, I said earlier that Roy shouldn't have his number retired, but after reading some of the posts on this site, I might have to disagree with my original thought. Mario Tremblay did hang him out to dry in that game. He still made the last two cups of this franchise possible, almost single handedly. His stats are amazing and his popularity in Montreal prior to the trade was sky high. His coaching has nothing to do with his career as a player and that is all that is honored when a jersey is retired. It doesn't matter what he does now or in the future, none of it has anything to do with what he did as a player. The only reason not to retire his number is because of The Trade. Is that totally his fault? The Montreal management at the time was weak and should have known better to side with their star player than with an incapable coach. I think he should have his jersey retired. Side note: I'd still like to see Guy Lapointe honored by having his name in the rafters.

DYCSoccer17's picture
Everyone is quick to point out how Patrick Roy quit on the team. Some blame his request to be traded as the reason for the franchise's malaise the past 10 years. Mr. Boone applauds Ken Dryden. Here's my take: Patrick Roy is not the reason why the team sucked for 10 years. Poor management, crappy drafts, a bad Patrick Roy trade and a bad John LeClair/Desjardins trade are the reasons. Patrick Roy demanded a trade. Is that considered quitting on the team? Yes. Ken Dryden sat out a year because he wanted more money. Both of these are terribly selfish acts. How come no one criticizes Dryden? Very few Habs players were as popular as Patrick Roy was. He is responsible for a generation of butterfly goalies from Quebec that seem to beat the Habs on a weekly basis. Patrick Roy had the nickname "St. Patrick". If you're popular and good enough to have a nickname in Montreal as a player, then there is a strong argument that you deserve to have your number up there with "Boom Boom", "The Roadrunner", "The Rocket", "The Pocket Rocket", "Big Bird", "Le Gros Bil", and "The Flower".

doug's picture
and "frankie the bull" (bouillon), "the russian tank" (kovalenko), "breeze-by" (brisebois), red light racicot. . . i think it takes more than a nickname! :) i do have to agree that upon further consideration what one does off the ice isn't really relevant. i don't like roy and i haven't since he left the team. . . but when he was with the team i liked what he did, when he winked at the kings player (tomas sanstrom? memory failing me) i loved it, and while he was never my favorite player or the guy i found most charismatic (even while he was skating around with the cup in '93 i remember being slightly embarrassed by his macho crap - seemed like he'd taken steroids since '86). . . he is one of the all-time greats in nets

VladIsMyDad's picture
I hope neither the Canadiens nor the Avs retire Roy's number. I hate him and his disgusting smug son.

DYCSoccer17's picture
Colorado retired his number the year after he retired.

VladIsMyDad's picture
oh. :(.

Gormdog's picture
And rightly so. You get a piece of the best goalie in NHL history while you can.

I've been a Habs fan for many years and I must admit I don't want to see Patrick's # 33 retired.I agree that he quit on the team and I also agree that Colorado should retire his number.Am I mistaken or not-When Gainey's number was retired -I did not see him shake hands with the visiting team-like Larry did.I thought he would also....

Big Bird's picture
My few cents from the peanut gallery: (1) If we are basing jersey retirement also on off-ice behaviors then what about Guy Lafleur? He's right now in hot water for effectively aiding and abetting his son to violate parole. Do we haul #10 down from the rafters? Maurice Richard assaulted other players on numerous occassions. Granted, many times it was deserved as he had put up with a lot of crap. However, if some of the stuff he did was committed now, could he be charged with assault like McSorely or Bertuzzi were? And yes, I do admire him greatly and will always recall the standing ovation he got at the Bell Centre opening as I was lucky to be there. Serge Savard was brutal in his treatment as GM of some players whose jerseys hang from the rafters by their very own accounts. Read Lafleur's or Robinson's autobiographies for details. Two sides to every story. Ken Dryden sat out for a full season because he was unhappy with his contract that he signed. Can you imagine the furor if Price pulled a stunt like that today? If we did not retire Roy's jersey there would be an air of hypocrisy in my humble opinion. I'm not saying one incident is better than the other but where do we draw the line? Not everyone behaves in the dignified manner as Beliveau. And before I get torn up, I do respect every single player whose jersey was retired. My point is that no one is perfect. (2) I respect Red Fisher a great deal but he's wrong to say 'Roy quit on the Canadiens'. Mario Tremblay hung him out to dry and humiliated him for 8 goals. I recall reading about the game against Detroit where Roy blew up. Steve Shutt who was part of the coaching staff at the time, was up in the rafters calling down to the bench, desperately telling them to pull Roy. Tremblay refused because he was the coach. Do you think Toe Blake would treat Plante that way? Or Bowman with Dryden? Didn't think so. (3) Lastly, I do not condone Roy's behaviour at all. Nor that of his son. If the QMJHL wants to suspend them both for the remainder of the playoffs and the entire next season all the better. But refusing to retire a jersey because of some stupidity of him as a coach is slightly extreme.

JasonM's picture
Absolutely epic post. Thank you for posting this : "Mario Tremblay hung him out to dry and humiliated him for 8 goals. I recall reading about the game against Detroit where Roy blew up. Steve Shutt who was part of the coaching staff at the time, was up in the rafters calling down to the bench, desperately telling them to pull Roy. Tremblay refused because he was the coach. Do you think Toe Blake would treat Plante that way? Or Bowman with Dryden? Didn't think so." Whether people like it or not, Patrick Roy was left out to dry. Does he have a huge ego? Yes, he does. But so do I. So do a lot of people. Roy plays and lives by his heart and when he was a Montreal Canadian, he gave them 2 cups that they honestly didn't deserve as much as other teams Roy allowed them to beat. Roy did a lot of volunteer work as a Hab, I remember that as much when he came to visit me in the hospital long ago. If the Canadians had proper team ownership, he would have played his whole career in Montreal and his jersey would already be in the rafters if it weren't for that night where a COACH thought he was being smart in teaching his star player a lesson that totally backfired on the team, the city and ultimately his job. Furthermore, you know what. Red needs to smell the coffee and realize that the last DECADE of hockey in this city suffered due to what I've said. Franchise players chased out of town, bad team management/scouting and players not wanting to play in a city like Montreal with the horrible horrible horrible media we have. Only since Gainey has come on board has things begun to change but there's one thing that Gainey won't be able to change, lousy fans and lousy reporters. Mr Fisher, if you're reading this. It's time to retire. # 33 should be in rafters but it'll never happen, no need to remind us all. Oh and what happened in the minors? Absolutely horrible but not surprising considering that the home team was raking the score 8-1. Nothing but bad things will happen when you start scoring like that, it'll happen in the NHL, the OHL, the LMQ, the AHL, the Laval Sportsplex, heck, even on the street. Don't rake up scores unless you're ready to endure the incoming goonage. Screw the Montreal Media for thinking otherwise and more important, screw Mario Tremblay.

Wamsley01's picture
Bingo Did Ken Dryden "quit on the Canadiens"? Did Roy punch a referee? Great post

Chuck's picture
Come to think of it, I'd also like to see Armand Mondou honoured. He played for us from 1928-1940. He might not have had the most stellar stats (50 goals in 418 games), but considering that he wore 11 different numbers it would be interesting to see a banner like this: :) . . . MONDOU 5__8__9 10__12 17__18 19__20 21__64 . . . ______________________________________ "All bow down before the Komisaurus Rex!"

Here I was thinking we shouldn't retire 33 because we're running out of low numbers, now you come along pull out all the rest ;-) At this rate the Canadiens are going to have to join the Arena Football League just to have enough shirts during training camp

TC's picture
Can't agree more with Butch Bouchard receiving the ultimate honor. For those of you too young to remember Butch. http://www.habsworld.net/article.php?id=1640&PHPSESSID=66f0788dcfaafd6d4... But we also shouldn't forget the great J.C. Tremblay. A couple of months ago I had the chance to ask Jean Beliveau who he thought was the one teammate that had been overlooked for the Hall of Fame. Without hesitation, he answered J.C. http://www.habsworld.net/article.php?id=1462 When it comes to numbers here's who else is missing from the rafters. #1 - Vezina, Durnan #6 - Blake #16 - Lach #33 - Roy http://www.habsworld.net/article.php?id=1461 I must respectfully disagree on Roy. His number should be retired. It's not a popularity contest, it's about achievement, and without Roy the Habs would have gone cupless since 1979. As for Roy quitting on the Habs, sometimes I wonder if the Habs as an organization quit on him that fateful night against Detroit. T.C. tc.denault@habsworld.net

I agree with your comments Mike. Bouchard would be a good selection but my vote would go for Elmer Lach, a great candidate for the "Hall of the Hallowed" if there ever was one. We certainly have room for another 16 up there.

RetroMikey's picture
Finally Mr. Boone I can agree with you. I've campaigned all along to have No. 5 Guy Lapointe being hounored as well. Why the heck was he not honored as well on the night they retired Boom Boom Geoffrion's jersey? Terrible boo boo by the organization, it's never too late to correct their mistake. "We will win the Cup only with Carey Price in the nets"

Guys I think it would be awesome to see the #11 up on the rafters. Even if Saku does not win us a cup he has carried the team on his back for a long time and never quit on us. He also never had the best supporting cast... until now! I am hoping we win a cup under captain K but even if we don't he deserves to be up there...

I think you guys are all grossly mistaken adn Roy's number should and WILL be retired. Let's not confuse his being a jerk with his on ice accomplsihments. This incident will be forgotten in a year or two by most of the modern world (maybe not this site but you know what I mean). His on ice achievements will never be forgotten......ever. His jersey will absolutely guaranteed 100 percent hang from the rafters and any Canadien fan should be proud for the on ice achievements when it does. Anyone under 40 years old doesn't remember the Habs winning if not for Patrick Roy's heroics. Sure some may think they remember as little children but to actually remember if you are under 40 yrears Roy is the Canadiens success. I really don't care what he does off the ice or on it anymore. He will have his jersey retired and rightfully so. He may not win Father/Hockey Parent/Husband awards and in fact may be downright awful at all of the aforementioned roles....as a goaltender he is perhaps the best goalie to ever play the game. Just last week everyone was raving watching the old video of the Habs Cups with Roy in nets. Too much flavour of the week blinding reality around here.....Roy is the absolute biggest reason our last cup win wasn't in a decade that started with a 197.

Wamsley01's picture
I agree with you 100% krob1000 I love you Boone, but you need to get off your high horse. I guess Guy Lafleur is a shining example of humanity. Remember him almost killing himself in the 80s by driving drunk? His womanizing (taken from his own book) and this whole ordeal with his son? Let's bring down number 10. He is not the shining example of what it means to be a Canadien! I love Lafleur and he earned that banner People 35 and under have only to look to Roy as the only bonafide Canadiens superstar, my generation got to see Lafleur, Gainey, Robinson only in their twilight years. Remove him from the equation and we are listening to 1979 Chants and going on 30 years without a Stanley Cup champion. Before Roy my heroes were Denis Herron, Rick Wamsley, Richard Sevigny and Steve Penney. Don't think there would be any parades with those Hall of Famers! Unless you can vouch for every individual in era's where Mickey Mantle ran around doing anything and everything he wanted and the media protected his Wheaties reputation and this generation where what Roy's son did ends up on youtube but would not have been noticed by anybody outside Laval 15 years ago then you can convince me. But you cannot prove any of that. Roy quit on the Habs as much as the fans quit on him. Booing the guy who arguably single handidly brought two extra cups to the city of Montreal is just as shameful as Roy telling Corey he was done with the Canadiens. Who was right anyways? Houle, Corey and Tremblay sure turned into brilliant executives didn't they. Every single one of us has worked for total buffons and would give their left nut to tell them to shove it like Roy did. Is it Roy's fault that Houle is a moron and did not force him to honour his contract? It is Roy's fault that Houle traded him for 10 cents on the dollar? Nope. That whole situation could have been handled more effectively if Corey had not hired rookies for two of the toughest jobs in sports. He is an All-Time great, he is the best goalie of his generation and he will be in the rafters come next season.

moser17's picture
"Anyone under 40..." I dunno, man ... maybe under 25 or so ... Isn't having a jersey retired a great honour? And aren't people who are honoured supposed to be lauded on the whole, as virtuous people deserving of honour? I agree with Boone and some other posters: the Hall of Fame is where Roy deservedly should be, for performing famous feats. But to have an arena full of fans of a hockey dynasty stand up and applaud you while your jersey is retired seems to have wider and more noble criteria than skill. That, I submit, is why they're different ceremonies.

I agree to some extent but while Roy was here he was the ultimate team guy and a winner through. Since the COnn Smythe has been awarded has there ever been a winner more deserving then Roy in either of those years......really think about it.....Gretzky??? LemieuX???? An argument can legitimately be made for Roy's as being up there with the greatest individual playoff performances ever.....please step outside of Roy the jerk and consider how great of an accomplishment that is. You know how many blog sites would have been calling him Patrick F. Roy if they had been around bac then????? He did the unthinkable....twice. Then he went and paid us back with a win for the Avalanche after leaving.....he is the ultimate winner.......on the ice that is.

moser17's picture
krob, I agree with you about his level of play, for sure. I grew up with posters of Roy in my room, autographed, wearing #33 jersey to school, pretending to be Roy playing street hockey, and talking to my posts in imitation of him when I played competitively. The man is an idol to many, and that's because of his high skill level. Where I disagree with you and others, it seems, is about why a person should be honoured with a ceremony like a jersey retirement. The Hall of Fame is for guys like Patrick Roy, whose record while he was still playing earned him accolades for enshrinement there. The jersey retirement is for guys like Bob Gainey, whose character on and off the ice in many arenas of human life earned him the honour of that special ceremony. It's less concrete than statistics, it's fuzzier than numbers, and whatever you like to call it, Patrick lacks it. Now, Roy may have his jersey retired, certainly: my posts aren't meant to be predictions. As a smart man said, "honour depends more on those who confer it than on him who deserves it." My posts are meant only to voice my view on why Roy shouldn't have the jersey lifted. But again, his life is far from over, and the same smart man said that true happiness (found partly in that honour) can't be ascribed to a man until his life is long-lived or over. If Roy turns himself around and becomes a class-act, in some way, then he may one day deserve the jersey retirement. But until then, keep him in the Hall of Fame, and leave the Gainey's and Robinson's the honour of the present hour.

It is 2008 so a 40 year old would have been born in 1968 meaning they would have been 10 or 11 years old for the last cup without Roy.....A sad reality.

moser17's picture
Ah, I get your meaning now, krob. I misunderstood: thought you meant too young to remember Roy's winning years. My bad on that one.

sidhu's picture
I agree!

Sadly, I have to agree Mike. Ultimately, Roy quit the team and leaving as he did leaves no room for him in the rafters of the Centre Bell. If they have to retire a number next year, I'd put up Saku's number prematurely, with his OK. I always thought Roy was slightly better than Dryden, because he didn't have the powerhouse playing in front of him that Dryden did. Although, Ken did a pretty good job in 1971 against two superior teams, the Bruins and the Blackhawks. It's too bad things turned out the way they did. Roy's reputation has taken a beating here in Saint John as well as he had an unflattering article written about him by a local reporter who said getting an interview with him was akin to getting an audience with the Pope. Roy supposedly gave the guy quite an ear full at a later meeting.

sidhu's picture
As I noted below with respect to Saku: He will be a serious candidate if he gets us a Cup. So far, we've missed the playoffs more years than we've made it under his tenture - not exactly an impressive credential when you have #4, #9, #16, #29 and other champions up there. Patrick won twice and was MVP both times (first as a rookie), Saku zero so far.

moser17's picture
Of course we all know what you and the reporter mean, but I chuckled when I read your post. I imagine that the difficulty of getting a meeting is what's being compared, but for some reason my first thought was: "I'll bet a meeting with Patrick Roy is nothing like a meeting with the Pope!"

Chuck's picture
With the HI/O number retirement discussion now having been reopened, may I respectfully suggest that perhaps the greatest Hab that isn't rightfully honoured with his number hanging from the rafters is Georges Vezina. I see no reason why the number 1 can't be retired twice. . . . ______________________________________ "All bow down before the Komisaurus Rex!"

RetroMikey's picture
I agree Chuck, and while they are at it, #5 Guy Lapointe deserves the recognition as well. I don't see why they can't do it since they did it both with Yvan Cournoyer and Dickie Moore both wearing the #12 jerseys. "We will win the Cup only with Carey Price in the nets"

moser17's picture
Yah, once it's retired no one else will be wearing it, so it's possible to raise it again to the rafters with another name above the number. It makes sense to honour two or more great players and people.

sidhu's picture
Patrick Roy's number will be retired by the Canadiens - it's a question of when, not if. He brought us a Cup in 86 and 93, he was unreal in net, he won as a rookie. He is one of the greatest goalies of all time and the best Canadien for many years. Sure, there is still sore memories from the infamous Detroit game, but time heals all wounds and eventually he will be recognized on the merits for a glowing Canadiens career, rather than one night of anger and frustration. I won't speculate now as to what number the Habs should or will retire next, but it's clear to me that Roy's #33 will be up there one day. It's interesting that, according to Wikipedia, "the Canadiens have not issued Roy's old #33 jersey since he left the team."

Mike, Would it be reasonable to have a 3 for 3 retirement ceremony in which Butch Bouchard, J.-C. Tremblay and Guy Lapointe are simultaneously honoured?

Chuck's picture
Guy Lapointe wore number 5. . . . ______________________________________ "All bow down before the Komisaurus Rex!"

Oops, I meant Joe Hall not Guy Lapointe. While I was writing, I was thinking Geoffrion and Lapointe might have made a decent double-retirement. It's Monday.

You can put Brian Engblom up there instead...

But Engblom didn't die as an active player. Admittedly he didn't play a long time with the Habs, Hall did die during the playoffs so that must count for something. Maybe they could name a corridor at the Bell Centre "Joe Hall" - get it..."Joe...Hall". A hall is also called a corridor and...ah forget it.

Chuck's picture
Or wait 15 years for O'Byrne! :) . . . ______________________________________ "All bow down before the Komisaurus Rex!"

I think retiring the number 3 would be a great idea. Another number that deserves such an honour is 6: not many players can match Toe in terms of his success on the ice and as a coach.

Wow. I agree...lets not retire his number for things he did 15 years after he last played for us. While his level of class has always been in doubt and has fallen further, I laugh to myself reading these posts. That stuff you saw the other night in the Q has happened 1000's of times in hockey and will continue to happen 1000's more. Its part of the game, tempers get lost things happen. Until Roy gets accused of sending out guys to break legs or swing sticks at heads, I honestly could care less and other then a very small subset of fans (read: you guys) most people could care less as well. A simple check of the number of fans in the stands for the next meeting and the number of articles written about it in the papers will attest to that fact.

Fer_hab's picture
I agree. Who f'en cares. This is just another of many examples of how media and easily lead idiot no brain fans make mountian out of a mole ESPECIALLY when it comes to Roy. People should really get that I hate Roy stick out of their asses. This guy is a millionaire who decides that he wants to be a owner/GM/coach for a junior team, riding the buses, grabbing hockey bags from the bus. For what SO HE CAN GIVE BACK TO THE GAME THAT GAVE HIM SO MUCH. Give him a f'en break and the respect hes earned.

Wow, sometimes people post things are are so stupid and non-sensical that I cannot sit idly by and not challenge said stupidity. Patrick Roy sent his son 200 feet down the ice to attack an unwilling combatant. There was no need for this. The opposing goalie was in no way involved in the brawl. There is no evidence that the opposing goalie caused the brawl. There is however video evidence of Roy jr assaulting another player and attempting to cause injury. The opposing goalie did not fight back, and instead had to turtle to prevent serious injury at the hands of Roy jr. The number of fans that attend subsequent games does not excuse or explain away the disgusting behaviour of both Roys. 30,40 and even 50 game suspensions should be issued.

You need to go watch Figure Skating. Secondly PROVE that he sent his son down there to fight. Prove it smart guy. According to Roy JR, his father was yelling for him to NOT go down there. The other goalie had come to the blueline, if you've played hockey before you'd have a clue what that means. Anyways it was completely nothing, and babies like you won't even dent that.

Yes he should be reprimanded for that event but to not retire his jersey......silly. I think Roy should be banned for a while from attending these games...he is a wingnut...but he was a hell of a goalie and hockey player for the Canadiens and him being a jerk has nothing to do with his jersey being ertired....it may delay it but it will not change it.

moser17's picture
I hear ya, but sometimes ignoring idiocy is the best form of agression against it. Remember Tom Stoppard's Player: "You don't understand the humiliation of it; to be tricked out of the single assumption which makes our existence viable: that somebody is watching!" Different context, but it's as true of internet soapboxers as it is of actors (but more tragic in the case of the latter and more pitiable in the case of the former.)

P St. Pierre's picture
Patrick Roy is my favorite all-time player, but he doesn't really deserve to have his number retired. Guy Lapointe and Butch Bouchard are both good choices. I wouldn't be opposed to seeing Guy Carbonneau's 21 after Higgins retires (or leaves).

I'd much rather see #11 retired in the future! ------------------------------------------------------------ My ultimate dream: Captain Saku Koivu skating around the Bell Centre holding the Stanley Cup.

doug's picture
love koivu not in the top 20 habs of all time

sidhu's picture
He will be a serious candidate if he gets us a Cup. We've missed the playoffs more years than we've made it under his tenture - not exactly an impressive credential when you have #4, #9, #16, #29 and other champions up there.

Thank you, Mr. Boone, for echoing what so many of us have been feeling this weekend. It's painful to note how far this childhood hero of mine has fallen in my esteem. It feels akin to finding out that Superman, when he's not saving the world, is a complete jackass. Sure, everyone's allowed their foibles, but Roy has shown, with disturbing regularity, that he has little respect for the integrity and dignity of the game that has afforded him his privileged life. As sickening a display as it was by Jonathan Roy, I do feel sorry for him, as you can only presume he has learned such a thug-mentality from his father, or at least not been steered away from it. I don't know how much it would mean to Patrick to have his number retired by the Canadiens (as someone here noted earlier this weekend, he has demonstrated a certain ambivalence toward the club), but the idea should certainly be reconsidered, and put on hold for the time being. Were Patrick to change his ways and make a positive and constructive difference to hockey in the next 5-10 years, I would consider revisiting the idea of honoring his #33, but until then, it will only be tarnished by ugliness like this.

I loved having Roy in the nets for the Habs, but I'm in agreement here, his number doesn't belong hanging from the rafters. Maybe our resident pollster can start a poll about this?? ------------------------------------------------------------ My ultimate dream: Captain Saku Koivu skating around the Bell Centre holding the Stanley Cup.

frank81's picture
Does anyone know if Roy was invited to attend Gainey's jersey retirement ceremony? He was conspicuous by his absence. If he has so little respect for the organization (and its legends), I have a hard time believing that they would seriously consider retiring his number.

Chorske's picture
He reminds me a bit of Ty Cobb. Clearly a superior athlete and huge competitor, but did nothing to endear himself to teammates. Throughout his career he was dogged by controversy: fights with teammates; refusing to play the last few games one season to ensure that he had the highest batting average (which allowed him to win a car); charges of racism; many violent assaults, including one on a handicapped spectator; and his horrible relationship with his son. Cobb was a shoo-in for the Hall, in fact, if I remember my facts right, Cobb was the first player to be inducted. As for Roy- I do think his jersey should be retired, for the Cups and the butterfly and many exciting years of hockey. Just PLEASE PLEASE keep him away from Habs management. We finally have some brains running the show. Heart and passion are fine on the ice but I want the coaching staff and management to have BRAINS. Roy has demonstrated on many occasions that he has none.

Ian G Cobb's picture
I loved Roy when he played but Red's right, Jacques Plant was by far and away the best and quickest ever for us. I might go as far to say that Charlie Hodge was better than Roy. No matter who was the best man at the game. He would be an embarrassment to all hockey fans to see Roy's # in the rafters with great men. Roy is not a man, he is now a bum, what a shame.