Canadiens turn corner into second half

posted by Dave Stubbs at 23h45 EST on Jan 11


0reportcard.jpg

Canadiens general manager Bob Gainey will meet with the Montreal media on Monday to review his club's first-half performance.

• The Gazette's Pat Hickey offers his own assessment of the Canadiens' first 41 games.

• From Sunday's Gazette, Red Fisher's view of the first half, pegged to Saturday's 6-5 win over Washington.

• Dave Stubbs writes about Sergei Kostitsyn's dramatic game-winning goal of Saturday and, in the same column, discusses the timely resurgence of Tomas Plekanec.




StumbleUpon

Comments

[Jump to comment form]

Mike T's picture
I presume it's over now? Did Bob address these heavy Vinny rumours?

Bugs's picture
So the priority is a defenseman, says Bob. Aw'ight. Personally, I think Gorges could kick OB's *** and learn to shoot like a juggernaut but ok. No, see, I've been thinkin' it over. And though it would hurt, I think it would BOOST much more in the final analysis. Plecky, Higgy, Sooby and a 1st rounder for V4? Do it. Let's do this thing. I'll cry for Sooby later. Do it. Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

Bugs's picture
ALERT! The State of the Union is commencing! Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

Habsrule1's picture
Can we hear it anywhere on the net? Go Habs Go!! "I can't hear what Jeremy(Roenick) is saying because my Stanley Cup rings are in my ears" - Patrick Roy Habsrule

Bugs's picture
team990.com ckac.ca Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

Is there any team more fun on non gamedays?

mrhabby's picture
is Vinny's wife hot , really hot.......if not don't do the deal.

i am trying - this is from 2007 - caption said it was his GF. http://i14.tinypic.com/54jtrg4.jpg

it would be incredibly surprising were she not.

mrhabby's picture
lol..just trying to lighten things up given its a cold monday in January.

Bugs's picture
Your favorite esquire is havin' himself a good'ole time as "Leo." http://blogs.tampabay.com/lightning/2009/01/owners-happy-wi.html?cid=144... Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

Xtrahabsfan's picture
Clearly we can't keep all our team together next year so something has to give,it's all about winning with the right payroll.

anotherhab's picture
Everyone's dreaming if you think Vinny is coming to the Habs during the season! Were pretty much up against the cap. Vinny is 7.2M this year, 10M for the next eon! TB will not want BIG salary back! That's why the rumour to trade him is out there. I can only see it happening around draft time when we have the cap space because we don't re-sign two of the following UFA - Kovy, Koivu & Tanquay! Can you imagine Bob announcing the trade at the draft in Montreal before our first draft pick! Anyway, which of our young studs do we trade??? I really have mixed feeling about all this. Does Vinny want to play for us in the first place? Do we want near 1/5 of our cap space alloted to one player. Remember were in a recession and the cap will likely drop the next couple of years! Maybe Bob should stay the coarse - it seems to be working well!


mrhabby's picture
I would not trust the owners of TB as far as i could throw them. there full of ***. Look at what they tried to do this summer and where are they in the standings now. There is only one thing clear to me..they can't manage there finances period.

that is 2 days old...the rumours were squashed once and then have since come back

In any case, his agent was told by management Vinny was staying, that still stands in Vinny's mind I would imagine. If you believe Dreger then the other powers that be in Tampa are more concerned with the bottom line. It will be awfully difficult for Gainey to walk away from gettng Lecavalier, no? The big centre needed here for so long. Stanley Cup winner. Quebecois.

his agent his heading back to Tampa ...there appears to be a divide within the Tampa management team. This is the NHL ...Wayne Gretzky can be traded...anything is possible.

mrhabby's picture
agents are full of crap..they say anything.

everyone's full of crap including management and agents, but that's not the point, does it make sense for both teams to make the deal?

mrhabby's picture
Yes it makes sense given the logic. We need the star centre and they need to get younger and cheaper.

24 Cups's picture
It’s a non game day so I might as well bite and fantasize about Vinny coming to Montreal. If this deal was to happen, the Habs would have to be prepared to give up quite a bit seeing that the other team is trading their franchise player. Conversely, Tampa has to realize that Vinny’s massive contract (coin and term) also undercuts his overall value in any trade. Let’s stick with the rumour mill. Giving up Pleks is a no brainer seeing that we finally land the big centre we have needed for years. We would have to drop a centre to make room for Vinny and Pleks would be that man. . MaxPac replaces Higgins, which helps ease his loss to the team, now and in the future. Both these guys are RFAs who will sign for a combined income of close to $7.7 mil, which just happens to be Vinny’s cap hit for the next 10 years. Subban or McDonagh? You have to give to get a fish as big as Vinny and we would be dealing from strength in that we have two of these guys in the system, plus Weber. You also have to remember that they are prospects, they have great potential but so far haven’t accomplished anything in the NHL. Letting one of them go for a top ten player in the league (who is at his peak) makes sense to me. Of course, that’s also the problem. Vinny has about 5 solid years ahead of him and then he starts to approach the other side of the mountain. The only negative that I see to this deal is the 10 year term of his contract. I can live with the cap hit long term, although I’m not sure how we would accommodate the $1.790 mil prorated differential between Vinny and Higgins/Pleks for the rest of the year. But hey, it’s only money! If you win even just one Cup with Vinny, then this deal becomes worth it. Going For The Brass Ring - 25 Cups In 100 Years

mrhabby's picture
steve, we are assuming that TB wants to become younger and cheaper, what if they don't. I would not be surprised if KOMI is in that conversation somewhere. Iam torn..i just want a player who bleeds the CH.Just not sure Vinny has the balls.

I agree, because I know Komi does. But it is Lecavalier. If Tampa is looking to get cheaper they sure don't want Tanguay and Lang eh?

mrhabby's picture
agree to what you are saying.

And how do you sign the rest at the end of the year. If you don't win this year you have lost a lot of guys. We have about seven guys to sign this year How do you do it.

Here's the link to the Dreger story on TSN: http://www.tsn.ca/columnists/darren_dreger/?id=262963&lid=headline&lpos=... Does Vinny even want to come to Montreal? I would hate to part with so many bodies, wasn't that Sam Pollock's rule..don't give more bodies than you get in return? But I guess Vinny would be a pretty good body at centre. So much money though!

MikeL's picture
Wasn't it also Sam Pollock that stated the team that wins the trade is the team that gets the best player? Correct me if I'm wrong.

'He who gets the best player wins the deal'

you are both right. i guess sam was covering his bets! anyway, the problem is giving the other team so many good players and unknown prospects, the best player could well emerge 3 or 4 years down the road. for some reason i keep thinking of the langway trade, we made washington a pretty good team with that one. wouldn't want to do the same for tampa bay.

Rugger's picture
Philly made Quebec/Colorado a great team, what did Philly get?

and we gave them the cup when we gave them roy and keane.

Chris's picture
Montreal made Philly a great team in return with Leclair/Desjardins for Recchi. Multiple good bodies for one great body is NEVER a good deal, even if you get the best player back.

Pollock operated exactly the opposite way. He trade multiple bodies for Lafleur and others.

Chris's picture
Here's the Lafleur trade, courtsy of TC Denault's website http://www.habsworld.net/article.php?id=1472 (which is fantastic in general...great work, TC!): Montreal Canadiens trade Ernie Hicke and Montreal’s 1970 first round draft pick to the California Golden Seals for Francois Lacombe, cash, and California’s 1971 first round draft pick. So body and pick for body, cash and pick. Since the Kings threatened to upset his plans by finishing worse than California, he bolstered them with: Montreal Canadiens trade Ralph Backstrom to the Los Angeles Kings for Gord Labossiere and Ray Fortin Body for two bodies.

A couple of career minor leaguers thrown back doesn't make your point very well.

Chris's picture
The benefits of hindsight, Earl. Ray Fortin was good enough to play 57 games on defence for the eventual Stanley Cup finalist St. Louis Blues the season before he was traded to the Habs. Gord Labossiere had 89 points in 161 games over the three seasons before he was traded to the Habs. Backstrom was very much on the decline, but still put up 129 points in 214 games over the same period. I don't really see that as a NHL player for nothing...Pollock knew he would bury those players, but they were still decent players. As for the first trade, the Habs gave up Ernie Hicke, who would go on to play 520 NHL games, and their first round pick for the first round pick that became Lafleur. The trade was a steal for the Habs because it was to obtain Lafleur, but even there Pollock made sure to get back Lacombe, who never cracked the Habs lineup but was able to play 440 career games in the rival WHA.

You seem to be making my point for me Chris

Chris's picture
You've completely lost me then. You said that Pollock routinely traded multiple bodies for a single player, and used the Lafleur trade as an example. I decided to look into it, and don't really agree with your assertion, and used the Lafleur trade to illustrate my point. The fact that those guys couldn't crack the Montreal Canadiens line-up of the early 1970's doesn't diminish their skills...they were an insurance policy that was never needed. These hindsight identifications of trades as being lop-sided usually forget to include the historical context of the era. Guess we're once again agreeing to disagree. :)

mrhabby's picture
damn ur right..what an ugly trade that was for us.

that one hurt a TON! leclair scored 700 goals on montreal alone after that.

Rugger's picture
I had blocked that one from my mind, LeClair, being a Vermonter was my favorite player at that point (my sister has a picture of my twin neices with him and the cup the summer of '93 when he brought it home)

The first and most important thing everyone seems to be missing is that Montreal doesn't have the cap room at the moment for Lecavaliar. Trading Higgins and Plekanec doesn't create enough room. Gainey will have to move a big ticket player like Lang or Tanguay to get it done. Tampa is looking to get younger and cheaper if they make this deal. Not sure they would want either Plekanec or Higgins as both will have salaries of around $3.0m next year. Not exactly a cap savings. If this deal get done, my quess is Tampa would want a bushel full of prospect that they can keep at a cheap price for a few years and use the money the save by moving Vincente next season on a UFA. To make a long story short, I think Lang/Tanguay would be headed to Tampa and a few blue chippers. Tampa then would move Lang/Tanguay at the trade deadline for a few more prospects.

24 Cups's picture
Earl - I didn't read your thoughts before I posted mine, but I'd still go ahead with your deal as well as my own. There are benefits to both proposals and we still land up with Vinny which is a huge upgrade on either combo of players being discussed. What about the prospects? Well, we would have to see who they are but not all of them are ever going to be Habs. They are assets to be used to improve the club in areas of weakness. In terms of upgrading our main weakness, they don't come much better than Vinny. Going For The Brass Ring - 25 Cups In 100 Years

you are correct, sir

WindsorHab-10's picture
I agree with Pat Hickey's comment about BGL. We need him to get healthy & fast because we can't afford other players fighting & getting hurt. We've managed thus far but if there's no light at the end of the tunnel, perhaps Gainey can look at acquiring Chris Neil from Ottawa. They seem ready, willing and anxious to unload players.

lavie's picture
Agree. Like TOR, Ottawa's players will be on auction soon.

lavie's picture
Alex Tanguay (born November 21, 1979, in Sainte-Justine, Quebec). Alex "changed" to be willing back home when he was 29 years old. Vincent Lecavalier (born April 21, 1980 Ile Bizard, Quebec). Do I have to assume Vincent does so when he is 29 years old?

SmartDog's picture
There are a lot of good posts here (Big Bird and others)... about what the Habs have and might need. But the fact is we have a new problem not discussed below. It seems almost odd that the Habs are playing as well as they are, and SCORING as they are without TWO of our very best players and reliable point getters in Koivu and Tanguay. So the question is: how do you take chemistry into account? What happens when players come back? Does chemistry mean you should trade away some of our team clinic players since the team is clicking without them? Or does it mean you shake the dice? My worry is that Bob does make a trade, the players come back, three guys get sent down, and the team sputters and stumbles it's way into the play-offs. That said, which is the right priority? A. Do anything to keep The Line-up as it is! This would mean looking to trade away a couple of 'team clinic' guys for probably a solid D-man (our most obvious need) so we can build on the CURRENT chemistry up front and not mess it up. B. Let team clinic come back and displace the young guys. ...see what happens when rookies are sent down and hope we don't lose anything. C. Make any trade the helps the team This would probably be a 2 or 3 for 1, since we have a glut of GOOD players and our need is only for an added great player. Tough call to make. There's a real risk coming either way. ~ Listen to the smart dog - he knows his poop!

The Cat's picture
Not trying to be negative, but yeah the habs are winning, but they're not winning the way a championship club wins. Theres been progress from last year, but theres a small hurdle yet to jump over still. IMO if its possible for Vinny to come, the habs must do it.

MikeL's picture
It truly is a tough call to make, but GREAT players are very rare and it is even more rare for them to actually become available. Unless we plan on finishing last anytime soon, or plan to get extremely lucky at the draft, a stud first line center isn't going to fall onto our lap. You have to give up a lot, take the risks, and pray it works out. This is our true chance to land a stud center that will play here for years. Can you imagine the next 10 years with a Vinny and Price. It makes me giddy.

SmartDog's picture
That's my point. Our depth right NOW gives us an opportunity we may not get again. Cold hard fact: we could trade Tanguay AND Koivu AND Higgins for a Vinny or Kovalchuk and be a BETTER team. I'd had to see Koivu especially go... but if we could trade them for a top line center like the two I just named AND get them on a long-term contract, I would take that gamble. I think it's our best bet for a cup in 09. Period. ~ Listen to the smart dog - he knows his poop!

Chris's picture
My worry is that your best bet for a Stanley Cup in 2009 could cause issues in 2010-2015. I have posted it before and still believe it: one-shot runs at the Stanely Cup are rarely successful. You win Stanley Cups by being in the mix year after year, not by loading for bear for a single run. I am completely happy taking a chance at it this year and then re-tooling the lineup as necessary in the summer without giving up a ton of prospects.

odis_habs's picture
Does anyone know what the conference is about? Just a mid-season update? Trade? News? ana answer would be greatly appreciated!!! peace drive for 25

odis_habs's picture
drive for 2Does anyone know what the conference is about? Just a mid-season update? Trade? News? ana answer would be greatly appreciated!!! peace drive for 25 5

It's supposed to be a mid-season report card but it is going to turn into the Lecavalier hour. Just a little more gas on the "I am afraid to play in Montreal" fire for Vinny.

smiler2729's picture
Just a pleasant little chat about what the Habs did in the first 41 games and how they will hopefully do in the next 41+ games. These pressers are necessary because of the religion that is the Montreal Canadiens, it is for us. Gainey will answer questions but will never tip his hat to anything transaction-related so don't expect any great revelations. He will probably tell us Carey Price is shooting for a Saturday comeback. P.S. Leafs suck!

mrhabby's picture
I wonder if Vinny would welcome a change from the sand to the snow. Does he have the balls to come back to Quebec, Montreal and Canada. So many peeps have said he wants to fly under the radar down there and cash his huge pay cheques and not deal with the pressure etc,etc. He has signed a long term contract for what seems an eternity ..does BG and uncle George want that hanging over them. Most of all does Vinny want to come back. No point in doing it if he will be miserable ..we don't need that. we need players who bleed the CH and would love the challenge.

HABZ24's picture
id trade higgy,lats,dags,draft choice and my left nutt for lacavalier,if and only if we can sign him long term and dont get burned like pitt did with hossa.a proven power forward who can score and french for the media to luv.we are an awesome team now, weve improved greatly as the seasons gone on.ps: BOB, GET KOMISERICK SIGNED NOW!! dont wait.but dont give too much the salary cap is going down they say for the next 2 years, we dont wanna be burdened with a huge contract.

WindsorHab-10's picture
No way would I let you get rid of your left nut.

TheDagger's picture
He is already loooong term.

Higgins21's picture
If anyone is like me today and have no work.....a real good Habs history site is www.ourhistory.canadiens.com. Lots of interesting reading and videos and characters galore. Check out Johnny "Black Cat" Gagnon (he was sneaky fast and centered Howie Morenz and Aurel Joliat if you can imagine) or Marcel Bonin (wrestled bears). Very enjoyable. Go! Habs Go!

Rugger's picture
Just wondering, when was the last time a Major mid-season trade like the one being discussed for Vinnie has lead to a cup that year? How often has it worked?

Chris's picture
The acquisition of Ron Francis/Ulf Samuelsson by the Pengins mid-90's for John Cullen and others is one I can remember off the top of my head. That was the one that I remember sort of touching off the trade deadline madness that now grips the NHL annually.

Butch Goring

Chris's picture
Once again, I stand corrected. :)

Bugs's picture
Old-timers talk about this guy Mahovlich? Seem to remember myself a certain Brian Bellows... Sure there are examples to be found. Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

Higgins21's picture
Hey Dave, What time is the press conference? Do you know if it's being carried live? What a time to announce a big trade. Do you think?

HNS's picture
I'm all for Kovalchuck. He would be an awesome addition to our lineup. Vinny can go screw himself. He'll end up leaving florida when the lightning organization goes belly up and ends up in Canada regardless....

Chris's picture
Regarding Higgins: How quickly we forget...two or three years ago, we were all hot to trot on Chris Higgins, seeing this kid who we thought would be an excellent third line centreman blossom into a very serviceable 2nd line left wing that could fit in on the top line in a pinch, providing 20-30 goals per year with potential for more. He's already an assistant captain on the team at 25 years old, his teammates love him, he plays an all-around game, he seems to always be available to the media, win or lose, in a tough media market. Higgins has established goal-scoring consistency (23, 22, 27 goals in his first three seasons) while improving his assist totals each season and performing well on the PP and on the PK. He's fast, he's got decent size, he forechecks...all the things people are braying about Pacioretty or D'Agostini having potential for becoming are already there in Higgins. Now let's look more closely at Pacioretty. He's one inch taller and the same weight as Higgins. They are both guys with good wheels. They both hit. On the top-line, Pacioretty blossomed for 15 goals in 37 games with Michigan in his first and only season as a 19 year old (as opposed to 14 goals in 27 games for Higgins with Yale as a 18 year old). He immediately turned pro and scored 5 goals in 31 games with Hamilton as a 20 year old (as opposed to the 21 goals in 67 games that Higgins put up with Hamilton as a 20 year old in his first season). Pacioretty was drafted 22nd overall by the Habs, although some felt he could have gone as high as 15th-17th. Higgins was drafted 14th overall. In World Junior Championship play, Pacioretty (albeit suffering from a thigh injury) put up 0 points in 6 games while Higgins put up 7 goals and 5 assists in 14 games over his two tournament appearances. So at the same levels and ages, Pacioretty has been out-performed EVERY TIME by Christopher Higgins. None of this means that Max Pacioretty will not become a better player than Chris Higgins...but an objective person would have an insanely difficult time proving to me Pacioretty will definitely be a better player like many of the posters here seem to believe.

MikeL's picture
At this point, I'd say Pacioretty has a higher potential than Higgins. Higgins hits? I don't think so. Max Pac is more physical and although he weighs the same as Higgins now, Max Pac is only 20! He will gain much more muscle mass in the next few years. Max Pac will likely remain on our team for the rest of the year, while Higgins played in Hamilton for 2 full seasons while a Montreal team struggled to make the playoffs. The depth now and the depth then isn't even comparable, yet Max Pac is on the big club in his first pro year. Comparing Higgins and Max Pac is apples and oranges. Higgins has trade value now, and if trading Higgins lands us Vinny, I'm all for it. Ask yourself this, if you personally had to decide who to trade in a package and it was down to choosing Max Pac or Higgins, who would you choose? I think we all know the answer, and that is why we all would prefer Max Pac.

Chris's picture
If I HAD to trade either Higgins or Pacioretty, I send out Pacioretty because I think Higgins' leadership is an intangible that gives him a higher value. I don't see Pacioretty as a 40 goal scorer (oops...I'm in for it now), so giving up Higgins' defensive skills, potential to play centre in a pinch and leadership for an extra 10 goals per year isn't a fair return. That being said, Pacioretty and McDonagh are the two Habs prospects on my no-trade list, as I feel they are both critical moving forward.

MikeL's picture
Number one - Higgins is a RFA at seasons end, while Max Pac makes under a million for the next 3 years. To get under the cap, we need to send salary the other way. Number two - Higgins has never played center in the NHL, and isn't about to start. Considering we already have 5 or 6 that actually do play center on our team, I don't see this as an asset at all. Number three - Higgins' defensive skills? Sure, he is responsible in his own end, but how many times can you think of that Higgins was out on the ice during the last minute of a one goal lead? It rarely happens. Number four - Max Pac is a more solid player and offers more to our team than Higgins. He is physical, with the potential to be a power forward. We already have plenty speedy scorers on the team - I choose the speedy AND physical guy over Higgins every time!

Chris's picture
Number one - agreed Number two - Higgins actually did play centre for a short stretch last season when the Habs were suffering from some injuries. And he was terrible on faceoffs. :) Number three - In his last 6 full games before being injured, Higgins was on in the last minute of a 1-1 tie against New Jersey (they scored quickly in OT, so he didn't get out in the OT), he was off in a 6-2 blowout win over the Rangers, he was on in a 5-4 win against the Thrashers, he was on in a 3-2 win over Buffalo, he was on in a 3-0 loss to Washington and he was on in a 3-1 win over Detroit. I don't feel like going any further back, but I think its clear your memories here don't exactly match up with reality. Number four - Higgins has more hits per game this season than Pacioretty (1.76 versus 1.6, although Pacioretty's hit per minute rate (approximatley 8:15) is better than Higgins (9:15, or thereabouts). As for the assertion that Pacioretty is a more solid player that offers more, we'll agree to disagree.

smiler2729's picture
I haven't forgotten Chris Higgins nor am I bitching about him. P.S. Leafs suck!

Higgins21's picture
A lot of heavy talking going on between Bob Gainey and Brian Lawton according to Darren Dreger of TSN. I said already that I'd take Vincent Lecavalier in a heartbeat but I'd like to hang on to Tomas Plekanec also. Send Christopher Higgins, Jaroslav Halak, Matt D'Agostini, Ben Maxwell,and a 1st round draft pick. Go Habs Go! I think I'm going to have to change my blogname. He was my favorite, but I'm getting tired of waiting for the breakthrough. Maybe when he gets healthy, he'll show me.

Chris's picture
Koivu, Lang, Plekanec, Lapierre...we're pretty solid at centre. If Lecavalier were to come over in a trade, which I personally find EXTREMELY unlikely, Plekanec has to go the other way. There isn't room otherwise, and Tampa Bay would probably want a centre to replace Lecavalier.

smiler2729's picture
Arrrgh! How about we send NOBODY to Tampa and let them keep Vinny since he's afraid of the spotlight in Montreal! Or how about we acquire Martin St. Louis much cheaper!!! P.S. Leafs suck!

Habsrule1's picture
I just emailed a buddy about St-Louis. Cheaper and he would look good in a Habs jersey too. Go Habs Go!! "I can't hear what Jeremy(Roenick) is saying because my Stanley Cup rings are in my ears" - Patrick Roy Habsrule

mrhabby's picture
my only issue with Martin is the guy is a smurf..do we need a smurf (a fast one)

smiler2729's picture
And Martin St.Louis isn't afraid of playing in a spotlight! Can you believe somebody here is taking exception to my "PS. Leafs suck" signature??? What's the world coming to eh? P.S. Leafs suck!

Bugs's picture
That "someone" was me, Smiley. And Smiley? IT WAS A JOKE. I was joking. Please reread and you will revel in my use of absurd intolerance and ignorant supposition. ...ferpetessakes... No one gets me! Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

Habsrule1's picture
Your sig is fine. People call Brisebois all kinds of names, and we can't say the leafs suck? Gimme a break. Go Habs Go!! "I can't hear what Jeremy(Roenick) is saying because my Stanley Cup rings are in my ears" - Patrick Roy Habsrule

Question for Habs historians: when was the last time the Habs scored 23 goals in one week? Sunday: 6 vs. Panthers Wednesday: 6 vs. Rangers Thursday: 6 vs. Maple Leafs Saturday: 5 vs. Caps

Bugs's picture
Last week. Peace Out ______________________________________________________ Lord Bugs Potter, esq. Earl of Fluppitburg, Baron of Fleenshire County and Knight of the Flannel Republic.

All of this Vinny talk is interesting but I would really, really hate to lose Pleks in the deal. I think Pleks could be resigned reasonably based on his numbers this season. Higgins is a big loss but one that I feel would have less impact due to Max PAc and D'Agostini's emergence. Lats is playing better and the Kostitsyn's are overcoming their difficulties. Pleks is our glue guy IMO ...he can do everything from kill penalties to play on the pp, he's a responsible two way guy, well liked, virtually mistake free. I would rather sacrifice a top notch prospect like a Fischer than lose Pleks. Can you imagine our team with Koivu, Vinny, Pleks and LAps up the middle? We already know that Markov, Hammer, Gorges, and Komi are going to be with us for some time. We really only have two spots to fill on D...we know Mcdonagh is one of them....then we have Subban, Weber, O'Byrne, Yemelin,Valentenko, Carle,etc fighting for the 6th and 7th spots. So you lose two of those defenseman....of all the teams out there we may be able to afford it. I'd rather throw in two more b grade prospects or one blue chipper and keep Pleks as he is ready and primed for our run over the next few years. I understand the logic is probably financial in that Vinny's salary probably wouldn't be much more than Higgy and Pleks together will command. The same thing could be said about Lang though as he could be let go after the season (or he could be signed affordably perhaps to be our 3rd line center again). I guess a good argument can be made for both sides......I would just hate to see Pleks go as guys like him are very hard to find. He isn't great at anything but is better than average at nearly everything ...and he never stirs the pot, never takes a night off and is the consummate professional. I'll ride the fence again on this one. I know you gotta give guys up to get guys like VInny in return but surely we could do it without giving up Pleks. I know that would mean we have 5 centers but surely someone could move to the wing for the season. In all reality this move sounds like something that if it were to take place would be better suited to happen during the offseason. FOr now let's get a dman and then get Vinny in the offseason when we have the flexibility to make an offer or not to Lang.

xaverian001's picture
If Bob has a chance to land Vinny then letting Pleks go is a small (literally) price to pay. I can't see TB letting a bonafide superstar go for 2nd line guys like Higgy and Pleks. The Subbanator is going to be a decent NHLer but if Bob can sell him while his stock is high then go for it. Having Vinny down the middle becomes our new glue and would solidify our lineup for years to come. Do it ... whatever it takes ... except Price ... do it.

I think their line of thinking would be that they have a number one guy in the future in Stamkos....they would be looking longer term. I guess part of what I am factoring in this is Vinny's salary and that beast of a contract. I am torn if it happened I would be Vinny's biggest fan but right now I am Higgy and Pleks biggest fans. Pleks size is a non issue in this to me ....he is good at everything and can play with anyone...very rare. I know Vinny is too but I think we have the other assets to make this work without Pleks leaving us. PErsonally I'd rather just add a dman and worry about the blockbuster during the offseason. I wouldn't have said that two months ago but I didn't know Dags and MaxPAc were NHL ready and they clearly are.

mrhabby's picture
so ur including Komi, the brothers, Markov , Hammer, Kovy , Saku in your list

xaverian001's picture
OK not Komi and Markov, but they can have whoever they want out of the rest.