Now what?

posted by Mike Boone at 7h27 EST on Jun 30


Sundin1.jpg

In a mere 28 hours, Mats Sundin becomes a free agent.

To play or not to play? That is the question.

And the Swedish Hamlet is in no hurry to answer, which leaves the Canadiens dangling and confronting their own question:

UFA or SFA?

Bob Gainey has phoned Sundin. He's e-mailed him. The Toronto Sun reports the Canadiens offered Sundin a two-year contract at $8 million per.

No decision.

Pat Hickey suggests the Canadiens should start formulating a Plan B, which might include Marian Hossa.

The Canadiens need a centre, Hickey writes, but the UFA crop thins out after Sundin – and it got thinner on Sunday when Minnesota traded Brian Rolston's rights to Tampa Bay for a conditional draft choice.

And as the clock ticks down to midnight, still no word on a new contract for Andrei Kostitsyn.

•  •  •

Edmonton bolstered its blueline by trading centre Jarret Stoll and defenceman Matt Greene to Los Angeles for d-man Lubomir Visnovsky.The Oilers assume the last four years of a five-year, $28-million contract Visnovsky sined wit the Kings a year ago.

•  •  •

Defencemen John-Michael Liles and Adam Foote have passed up free agency and are staying in Colorado.

Liles has signed for four years at $4.2 million per season. He was making $1.4 million, and Liles' extension is a benchmark for what the Canadiens will have to offer to keep Mike Komisarek beyond this season.

Foote was making $4.6 million and has signed a two-year contract at $3 million per.

•  •  •

How valuable is a puck-moving defenceman?

There are reports the Chicago Blackhawks will offer Brian Campbell $8 million a season when he becoes a UFA tomorrow.

Campbel was making $1.75 million in San Jose.

Hands up everyone expecting a 460 per cent raise this year.




StumbleUpon

Comments

[Jump to comment form]

vaya_'s picture
quick question - does free agency start at midnight, july 1st (tonight) or at noon, july 1st (tomorrow)? and on top of that, will many moves be made immediately (like at the trade deadline) or will most of it happen slowly, during the day? i was glued to my computer/tsn all day last year but i can't for the life of me remember how everything played out.

The Teacher's picture
A few big hits at the beginning and then more signings staggered throughout the day and week ahead. UFA begins at 12:01 PM July 1st.

vaya_'s picture
thought so, thanks teach. can't wait to see how teams will shape up.

drive for 25's picture
according to rds sundin will not sign before july 1st

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
where did they get that from? my post at 11am this morning? only BG and MS know the time and place...and it will be at their choosing.

mrhabby's picture
geee..tell me something i don't already know.

To think Bob doesnt have a Plan B or C and D is ridiculous. The smart thing was to get the exclusive negotiating rights to execute Plan A at no cost. This gives Bob a heads up if plan A will work and if necessary move to plan B July 1. Whether Mats is trying to screw the Leafs or not is speculation but I'm sure he has an idea of what he wants to do and probably has told Gainey as well. The problem is Gainey is not a Salesman. He fails to sell "playing for the Habs" as a good destination for UFA's. Look at freaking Tampa Bay....the owners are involved attracting players. We need George to "sell" Mats and/or others into coming here. Tradition is not enough....where the bleep is the Marketing department??? I've got my fingers crossed Mats signs with us but if not, we've already improved by adding Tanguay. A.Kostitsyn will sign, not Paul Carter money, after the Sundin drama is known and what its going to cost one way or another. Either way, Gainey has done a terrific job rebuilding this organization but we need another voice in selling it to UFA's. Bob should not be the lead guy in this department.

Greg's picture
Sources say Sundin was "very impressed" with the way Bob Gainey handled the situation in their phone calls. I think Bob does a great job of selling Montreal. It's just that until recently, he didn't have a lot of great selling points. As for Tampa Bay... players can sign there, and if it doesn't work out, they aren't labeled as trash and recognized by everyone on the street everyday. No one wants to play for a losing Habs team.

mrhabby's picture
would love to know if george spoke to matts.

The Teacher's picture
Plan B, C, or D. Don't overpay for a non-fit. Don't sign anyone. Good enough for me if we don't get Sundin or a better veteran D than the Breezer. However, if AKost gets signed to an ridiculous offer sheet that would bring us mucho quality draft picks in return, I say let him go and sign Hossa....that's the only way I would sign Hossa.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
lets not get carried away with Hossa, we need POWER up front, players that are not intimidated...then you can get your hossas to fill in, just like Tanguay, who is skilled, fast, but has zero grinding ability, therefore he needs a supporting cast in the playoffs to fight his battles. remember, this is all about the playoffs...discipline and power, just like Detroit, they are the role model.

The Teacher's picture
Umm, I don't want Hossa.

The Cat's picture
The leafs do treat their star players like trash, unfortunately the habs arent any better in that respect.

The Cat's picture
Why would Sundin be loyal to the leafs? Last year they made him feel like an unreasonable traitor for not wanting to be traded. Sundin may owe the leafs fans, but not the organization.

Greg's picture
Agreed. Kind of like the opposite of Saku Koivu. The organization has been nothing but classy to him, and yet fans consistently try and trade the guy.

thats an awful big generalization there. I would bet a bundle of cash most habs fans don't want Koivu traded

filincal's picture
HERE,HERE! I BLEED BLEU BLANC ET ROUGE!!!

The Teacher's picture
Exactly.

The Cat's picture
Hab-professor, your theory about Sundin is good I think. Its what I would do.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
it could be all smoke and mirrors, but Sundin appears to be the loyal type, and with what the leafs did to him last year...disgrace. those laffs do it to all their great players, look at Clark and Gilmour and Rick Vaive (all former captains)...they tossed them out like the trash...Sundin was next. Pathetic organization with a Pathetic track record. Sundin will sign (99% chance with us) but AFTER the deadline - therefore the laffs get NOTHING.

It goes back further than those guys....Ron Ellis? Dave Keon? Even Sittler was on the outs for years and still remains in the back rooms.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
corporate quarterly earnings first, concessions and t-shirts earnings first, answering to the controlling shareholders first, answering to TV revenues first,...then open the door for the "expendible player". a great player is 5,7,10 years max....the corporation is life and beyond. The laffs are masters of the corporate game...with expansion, they lost much of their pull with the NHL Syndicate, just watch "The Rocket", its all there.

was thinking the same thing in your last line - why not just agree to wait until 12:01 tomorrow to announce and sign the deal? that was he can show is loyalty to his new team by not costing them a pick. it's risky as there is a chance someone backs out.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
good point, i was looking at it from a 'vendetta' perspective of giving it back to his old team by denying them picks, but from your perpective it is a nod to his new team, by preserving their pick...very good!

Robert L's picture
A few posters below, Wencz and Smart Dog, were discussing the the blocked sale of the Predators to Balsillie by Bettman from an article at Hockeybuzz. It's funny how Bettman (who I don't trust much either) gets blamed for a lot of what is done on behalf of the NHL. The thing to remember though, is that the President rarely acts singularly in many cases. He works for the NHL owners and often does what he is asked or ordered to do. Going all the way back to the formation of the NHL in 1917, things such as this went on. There were always backroom deals with owners plotting out ways to get what they wanted. The NHL was actually formed that year as a means for owners to get rid of an unscrupulous Toronto Blueshirts team owner named Eddie Livingstone. Since they were powerless to revoke his franchise, they conspired to form a new league without him, and left him in the one team team NHA. Livingstone, in this type of shafting, was unable to sue them. Around 1938, the NHL also blocked the sale of another team - surprisingly our Montreal Canadiens! The Canadian Arena Company, which owned the Forum and the Maroons, had visions of selling the Canadians to Cleveland or St.Louis as the city of Montreal could no longer support 2 NHL teams. There were maybe 2000 fans showing up to fill the 13,000 seat Forum at the time. The Maroons had just won a Cup in 1935 and it was thought that they ought to be the team that was kept afloat. The sale of the Habs was proposed but blocked by the league governors, because they were convinced that the Canadiens were the stronger gate attraction for the league south of the border. Their distinct "Flying Frenchman" brand had remained a distinct curiosity and selling point for the team and the league with fans in other city. The Habs also had a lengthier and more storied history as the NHL's oldest team back then. Selling off the Maroons was the less financially viable option for the Forum owners and there were set to get more cash from selling the Canadiens. The man who did the convincing and stopped the NHL and the CAC from killing off the Canadiens was none other than Maple Leafs owner Conn Smythe! Smythe felt, and rightly so, that the NHL needed the Montreal Canadiens to survive. He wasn't wrong.

Bettman is a figure head for the NHL's owners. They pay his salary and you can be sure he knows it. He is an idiot but he gets blamed for to much of the crap that goes on in the NHL.

Great stuff, RobertL, thanks.

longtimehabsfan's picture
Here's what I believe will happen: Sundin gone. Hossa gone. Rolston gone. And AK46 possibly gone, which means BG can take draft picks and then go after another UFA. Which UFAs would you like BG to go after is this is the scenario on Tuesday?

Xtrahabsfan's picture
Grab big Bert and reunite him with Naslund ,it was the best line 4 short years ago.

mrhabby's picture
conspiracy you say..fill us in on your theory.

MikeL's picture
What makes you think Bertuzzi wants to play in Montreal?

Robert L's picture
Nobody in Montreal would want to play with Bertuzzi, and Gainey knows that.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
There is logic/reason behind all this madness and agony we are going through with the Sundin project. There is a massive rift that was formed between Sundin and the Leafs...simply the leafs wanted to trade away their leader for picks or anything and that stung Sundin the wrong way...very bad. Sundin will sign with the Habs, but only once he is a free agent - that way the Leafs get nothing. He will see this through so that the leafs get nothing, and there is no other path for Sundin...he has damned the leafs. thats my opinion...so relax.

filincal's picture
What's the most the leafs could get should Sundin sign tonight?? I BLEED BLEU BLANC ET ROUGE!!!

TommyB's picture
I'm not sure the Leafs get nothing in return if Sundin signs after July 1. If that were the case, then you could take a 10-day exclusive right to negotiate, make a deal during that time, but both parties agree to keep it secret and not make it official until after July 1. Doesn't sound right to me.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
Leafs get nothing after July 1st. thats why the excuse from Sundin has been.."not sure if I'm going to play this year etc..," thats his escape. whether they keep it secret has no relevance, nothing can be signed otherwise there would be massive fines and ridicule...I think Sundin has already decided, its Montreal and it will happen soon...and the leafs will get nothing, thats how Sundin wants it.

longtimehabsfan's picture
I don't see why any player who spent 14 years with an organization would do that.

HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
why would an organization try to sell Sundin to any takers...no "personal" repect there, just business... and thats what has turned Sundin against them.

longtimehabsfan's picture
I hope you're right about this but I'm having a difficult time believing Sundin's indecision, intentional or not, is about screwing an organization he played for that long. Of course, people are people and I'm sure he wasn't happy about the bad ink he got at the trade deadline. But he was well protected with a no-trade clause and he can cash in on free agency. I just feel that if Sundin wanted to play in Montreal this deal would have been done by now.

filincal's picture
if that's the case, then Grapes will turn his back on Sundin quicker than a vegetarian from Burger King. I BLEED BLEU BLANC ET ROUGE!!!

TommyB's picture
Here's hoping you are right!

coutNY's picture
I was just figuring out what a 460% raise would do to my income, and I came to the realization that Campbell's current contract of $1.75 would be still 5X's what my larger than mine, even with the hefty raise. Makes me feel much better about playing on the Net around deadlines.... LMAO

twilighthours's picture
Again, sorry to be this type of person but Campbell's raise would actually be 360%. The formula for the amount *raised* is ((new - old)/old) * 100, and therefore this (in Campbell's case) works out to be approximately 360%.

coutNY's picture
True, thanks, in the process I wasn't considering the intial amount... I don't feel as good wasting time now. I'll Man UP here and also admit I was wrong earlier in the defence of Boone mathmatics... Should have known! Just kidding Mr. Boone....

Does the trade of Visnovsky lead to the resigning of UFA Rob Blake as the Kings must be breathing much easier after trading away Visnovsky's ridiculuos contract.

MikeL's picture
Maybe they give Drew Doughty a shot at making the team. Plus I think this was a good trade for Edmonton. Visnovsky is a similar type player to Markov, and paid the same. Playing on worst team in the league last year can't help out the stats. He scored 17 and 18 goals the 2 years before this one. I think he's a good fit in Edmonton. Plus I'd say Pitkanen will be moved sometime over the summer.

Visnovsky contract is for 7 million/season the next two years .... http://www.nhlnumbers.com/overview.php?team=EDM&season=0809

MikeL's picture
yes, but the cap hit is only 5.6 million

Visnovsky isn't in the same league as Markov , he's only an offensive "D". The Kings are so happy to get rid of that contract .... http://www.dailynews.com/kings/ci_9739742

the real vinnydj's picture
Ok Mats, your so called "loyalty" you showed to the leafs fans was basically confused with the lack of passion you have to win the cup, and by you not giving anyone an answer on your current status and by risking the chance to a part of a solid contender, you have just confirmed my thoughts of you.

howtathor's picture
News Flash: TSN reporting that Mats Sundin has agreed to terms with the Montreal Canadiens for 2 years/16m dollar deal... ...then I woke up!

mrhabby's picture
damn you.lol

the real vinnydj's picture
Why would you do something like that?

MikeL's picture
well that was annoying. My heart jumped for 0.2873 seconds.

SmartDog's picture
Go back to sleep. ~Listen to the smart dog!

saskhab's picture
How about Jason Williams? 36 points in 43 games (that's a 70 point pace, folks), plays right wing and centre. Only 27 years old, coming off a back injury (don't know if he's still hurt), and shoots right.

twocents's picture
Tons of injuries and smallish, not really an upgrade. Now Justin Williams that would be alright... but, he's not available so that ain't gonna happen.

the real vinnydj's picture
Jason Williams would be good, but he missed a lot of time with that groin injury. Most of his points came on the PP if I'm not mistaken.

sask - I had him on my list as a semi longshot cuz i don't think he would gel with Carbo but has shown to have good hands.

I know that many here are critical of hockeybuzz.com, but I recently read a blog on there by Daniel Tolensky regarding the sale of the Predators organization and the backroom deals involving Gary Betteman and other NHL owners; extremely interesting stuff that stinks to high hell. Maybe it has already recieved attention on HI/O, but for those of you who are interested in the political economy of the NHL, this is a very intriguing story. Tolensky has followed it very closely and has done some excellent reporting. If anybody is sick of the Sundin/Hossa talk, but you still need some hockey, I highly recommend Tolensky's blogs about the Preds sale.

SmartDog's picture
Interesting. In short, why does it stink? ~Listen to the smart dog!

I'm still piecing it together, but basically the implication is that Gary Betteman did all he could (and was successful) at blocking the sale of the Preds from Craig Leipold to Jim Balsillie (a Canadian billionaire) a year or so ago. It was no secret that Balsillie intended to move the team to Hamilton. Betteman did not want this to happen -- not sure why exactly; might have been because it just didn't fit his US expansionary plans, or because there were cries of foul from Toronto, Detroit and/or Buffalo about another team in their 'catchment area'. In effect, Betteman persuaded the Preds owner (Leipold) to not pull the trigger on a very lucrative offer (about $240 million) from Balsillie. Shorlty after, Leipold sold the dying Preds for around $193 million to some 'local buyers' plus William "Boots" del Baggio, who has recently been charged for falsifying loan documents (for loans he used to purchase part of the Preds). Boots' plan was to move the Preds to Kansas City to play in a new arena built by Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG), whose owner is part of Betteman's close circle of executive advisors. AEG has ownership stakes in several pro sports teams and arenas. When Leipold sold, he claimed he did not want to own a hockey team anymore. Within a year (I think) he was able to buy the Minnesota Wild, a very stable, successful franchise close to his home (a great swap for the gasping Preds). The charge is that Betteman somehow orchestrated this purchase as a quid pro quo for Leipold not selling to Balsillie (for a huge profit at that). I might not have it all exactly right, but that's the gist of it.

Connecticut Man1's picture
Didn't the Ducks and Kings owners (part of Bettman's owners inner circle) loan money to Baggio to help enable this deal? I think the Kings owner is part of the AEG group that owns the arena in Kansas, as well. And I read somewhere that they loaned Baggio the money behind Bettman's back.

Sort of. Philip Anschutz (of Anschutz Entertaint Group) does own the LA Kings, and he leant some of the money to Boots. The stinky link here is that Anschuntz has the arena in KC, where Boots was allegedly going to move the team. But get this, apparently, Leipold also leant some money to Boots --- to buy Leipold's own team! Outrageous.

SmartDog's picture
Well written - very clear... thanks. Will check out the blog. No surprise that Betteman is a slimeball. You can tell that just by looking at him. He thinks what' good for Bettmen is good for hockey. A little Napoleon complex there... I wonder if he ever even laced up? Incredible that he came from basketball. He must've felt strange in meetings, looking up at everybody... "Sorry Mr. Johnson, I meant to shake your HAND" ~Listen to the smart dog!

Habhopeful's picture
LOL Thats a funny yet somewhat disturbing visual... "If I wanted to hear from an ***, I would fart..."

twocents's picture
Thanks for the synopsis. Nothing surprises me with Bettman.

The Lightning Bolt Effect : Tampa Bay has upset the NHL apple cart with their surprise moves lately and they haven't even addressed their top priority which is "D" men. They have sent the Ave's scrambling to resign Liles and Foote and the Oilers trading for an overpaid "D" as teams know no matter how poor the UFA "D" men crop is this year their value will increase drastically at noon tomorrow.

MikeL's picture
I'm not sure how Tampa trading for the rights to several forwards increases the value of D men. Overpaying for Ryan Malone doesn't really bring up Brian Campbell's stock. Plus they can't have too much cap space left.

- Did i mention Campbell. Teams may have had an eye on a UFA "D" but don't want to get in a bidding war with a team that is determined to improve regardless of the cost. Cap Space ... http://www.nhlnumbers.com/overview.php?team=TBL&season=0809

jkmorris's picture
I stumbled across HockeyBuzz.com. For two days they have had the Sundin deal with Canadiens done or near done. It constantly uses the word "sources" when dishing out their info. Completely unreliable information on that website. And it isn't just the Sundin situation. The beauty of the Internet...

twilighthours's picture
Ugh, I hate to be an arse like this, but Campbell, if paid $8 mil per season, be getting approximately a 360% raise (not 460%, as stated). Sorry Mike. But the math teacher in me had to do it.

coutNY's picture
Ugh, I hate to re-raise it, but 460% was about right in the first place... if Campbell were to make $8 (new contract)/ $1.75 (old contract) = 4.5714285714285714285714285714286 multiply that by 100 to get 457.142% or $1.75 * 460% = $8.05 million (1.75 * 4.6 = 8.05) your stated 360% would work out $1.75 * 360% = $6.3 million

twilighthours's picture
Ugh, but you're wrong. What if Campbell made the same amount next year? By your formula, (new/old) *100 = raise percentage... (1.75 mil (new) / 1.75 mil (old)) * 100 = 100% raise?? Consider an easier example: you make $100,000 a year. Your boss gives you a 5% raise. Now you make $105,000 annual. By your formula, you have calculated a 105% raise! No, the actual formula for the amount *raised* is ((new - old)/old) * 100, and therefore this (in Campbell's case) works out to be approximately 360%.

SmartDog's picture
You need to be an arse here now and then or you don't belong. ~Listen to the smart dog!

Connecticut Man1's picture
~Listen to the smart arse! Sorry... Couldn't resist. :)

SmartDog's picture
LMAO ~Listen to the smart dog!

SmartDog's picture
Hey Boys & Girls, Cats & Dogs, A little investigative journalism by the Smart Dog reveals the REAL dirt on Mats - not joking. First, check out this little note from an article a few months back: "And although he wouldn't tip his hand on his NHL future, he did suggest that retirement to married life was on his mind." Now use your noggin: Mats had a long-term relationship end in 2006 and got engaged to his new GF this past January after a year together. It would make sense that he's much more concerned about doing the right thing for his personal life than he is about anything else and in that case, she's just as in charge of where they go or if. His new wife-to-be is from a small Swedish town but now lives in Stockholm. She seems to love the USA - or at least the flag (suddenly I'm liking that flag more too) and the beach. My guess is retirement, but now I can see why Florida is in the mix...sure Montreal and NY are both fun cities, but I bet she doesn't speak French. Either way, he's not deciding alone, and he showed us last year that a cup is not his priority... which points in the same direction - family, a life. And we know what his priority is - personal life, and possibly, getting cozy with the good ol' US of A - or at least the flag... or maybe just staying in Sweden with his family, he family, and doing what the heck he feels like. Given that Mats has options, and is family-bound with a hot young chiquita, why not take his time, enjoy summer and go to Tampa. LOL... or where-ever he feels like it, when he feels like it - IF he feels like it. And that Boys and Girls, is what I would do. ~Listen to the smart dog!

mrhabby's picture
like i said yesterday, florida is on his radar. He also played with wade belak who was traded at deadline. if he goes some where else other than MTL then iam glad because we want players who want to win the Stanley Cup now...bottom line, end of story.

SmartDog's picture
Wondered where I heard that. How do you know Florida's in the mix? ~Listen to the smart dog!

MikeL's picture
Maybe Tampa? They seem to be going for something this year, although I don't know how much cap space they have left.

mrhabby's picture
toronto star and sportsent. i don't believe either one of them but ya got to think florida might be up there. sun, surf, no pressure have fun for 1-2 years.

SmartDog's picture
Based on my theory above, I'm down with that. If it were me, I'd go play with the Ducks or Kings. California baby. Love it! And for this reason I am sure Detroit is out. ~Listen to the smart dog!

nick's picture
So let me see if i understand this correctly... Mats Sundin, an extremely competitive player who has never won a Stanley Cup, on the verge of retirement is going to fore-go the retirement, pass up on a chance at the cup, all so he can get paid a couple million to sit around on the beach and play for a team that currently doesn't really stand a chance? Common.

SmartDog's picture
Then nick, why did Mr. Super-competitive not let his *** by traded for two months to the likely Stanley cup winner of his choice? And I said he EITHER will retire, or go to some nice destination where his Chiquita can have a life (since he's deciding for two now and in the article he says family is on his mind). ~Listen to the smart dog!

Blitzen's picture
What other teams really have a shot at Sundin? I'm guessing he has little interest to go back to the Laffs who are doing their best to land a lottery pick next year. If the Rangers resign Jagr (as they apparently are trying to do), do they then have the cap space to land Sundin at $8M per year? Is Detroit really that interested in Sundin at that Price? I mean they just won the Cup without him and need to resign some players. No idea if Ottawa has any interest in him. Ditto for the Sabres or anybody else playing in an area close to home for Sundin. With very few potential destinations, I'm hoping Gainey tells Barry that if he has no positive news from Sundin by this evening, he will go on the record saying he has no interest in him as a UFA. Let's not be used again to ramp up a guy's salary. _____________________________________________________ Remember February 19th: The Comeback

Blitzen's picture
UFA or SFA...another classic. Why do people wonder if Gainey has a plan B? Or whether he's focussing 100% on Sundin and forgetting AKoz? Do you folks think he sits around all day waiting for Mats to give him a call? I'm sure he has more irons in the fire than people realize. _____________________________________________________ Remember February 19th: The Comeback

J.T.'s picture
Two things: One, I think Gainey's acquisition of Tanguay has saved him from the SFA title. Tanguay might not be Sundin, but he's a career nearly point-per-game player. The team that won the East last year with the best powerplay and offence has upgraded, since it carried an underachieving Michael Ryder on the second line for much of the year. Two, NO HOSSA! Hossa is a very good winger, true. But the Habs don't need another winger. They need a centre or nothing. Adding Hossa means that Tanguay, Hossa, Kovalev, the Kostitsyns and Higgins are competing to play with Plekanec and Koivu. Somebody has to play with Lapierre and/or Chipchura. Throw in a third good centre and you're looking at three balanced scoring lines. Otherwise, you're heavy on wingers and thin up the middle. Plus, I don't think it's wise to spend the kind of money and term it would take to sign Hossa. It would be detrimental to the long-term plan to keep the team's core together. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

SmartDog's picture
Aside from AK46, I'm less worried about who Bob signs than I am about who I hope to God he doesn't sign - Slowinski, Breezer, Streit, Bert, Denis... Please Bob, no 2nd rate GAMBLES!! Save the cap space for opportunities later! PS: does free agency really begin at midnight? what time zone? ~Listen to the smart dog!

MikeL's picture
Tommorow at noon eastern.